The Ku Klux Klan's Master Stroke

THE KU KLUX KLAN'S MASTER STROKE

"During another period, in the not too distant past, there was a governor of the state of Alabama named George Wallace who also became a presidential candidate. George Wallace never threw a bomb. He never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged vicious attacks against innocent Americans who only desired to exercise their constitutional rights. Because of this atmosphere of hate, four little girls were killed one Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama." - Georgia Representative John Lewis...DEMOCRAT

With what appears to be the inevitable coronation of Barack H. Obama looming on the horizon it seems like an appropriate time to take stock of the accomplishment this truly represents for the African-American community. No, I am not going to praise the brilliance of how a 47 year old man, who has accomplished absolutely nothing in his life, has hoodwinked the white American population into electing him as some sort of "affirmative action" salve to ease its own self-loathing sense of guilt for the perceived crimes of their ancestors. Instead I would like to point out how the election of this man represents the ultimate sense of self-loathing that the black community feels towards itself. Find that hard to believe do ya? Well lets talk about genocide...or is it suicide? You make the call.

"I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby," - Barack H. Obama

"Punished" with a baby? How did we get to the point where the gift of life can be called punishment from the apparently inevitable future president? Hell, he didn't even suffer through much criticism for making such an honest statement of his true beliefs. There is another famous saying that states that "the end justifies the means." It is a statement that can be attributed to so many people that it is unwarranted to even try to give credit for its origins. However, there is a large portion of the American electorate, particularly militant feminists, who view unlimited and unrestricted abortions as a desirable "end." But what if the abortion issue was never an end but instead is the means to some other end? What, praytell, might that portend? You might be scared to find out.

Lets look at some statistics. In 2005, 1.21 million abortions were performed, down from 1.31 million in 2000. From 1973 through 2005, more than 45 million legal abortions occurred. That is 45 million people who were murdered before they were born. A lot of you may bristle at my choice of the word "murder." Though I am not myself a Catholic, I feel as though Pope John Paul II expressed it best:

"From the first instant (conception) there is established the program of what this living being will be: a person, this individual person with his characteristic aspects already well determined. Right from fertilization the adventure of a human life begins, and each of its capacities requires time-a rather lengthy time-to find its place and be in a position to act."

Who has abortions in the United States? While white women obtain 60% of all abortions, their abortion rate is well below that of minority women. Black women are more than 3 times as likely as white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are roughly 2 times as likely. 37% of abortions occur to black women, and 22% to Hispanic women. Yet when one looks at the results of the latest population census blacks make up only 12.4% of the total population. Hispanics actually have surpassed them with 14.8% with whites holding a commanding 73.9% advantage in the overall population. So we see that the two prevailing minorities have a disproportionate share of the abortions in the United States...interesting. Here is another strange fact; 47% of all abortions are performed on women who have had at least one previous abortion. Repeat business accounts for almost half of all abortions. Incredible!

Of the 45 million abortions performed since 1973 over 16 million have been performed on black women. This compares to only 4,785,870 African-Americans killed by AIDS, violent crime, accidents, heart disease and cancer COMBINED.

Columnist Michael Novak noted: "Since the number of current living Blacks is 36 million, the missing 16 million represents an enormous loss, for without abortion, America's Black community would now number 52 million persons. It would be 36 percent larger than it is. Abortion has swept through the Black community like a scythe, cutting down every fourth member."

Many people in the black community rightly view this as cultural genocide, but somehow their voices are being drowned out by the pro-choice media that supports democratic candidates that in turn support unrestricted abortion rights. Senator and heir apparent to the presidency Barack H. Obama even has gone so far in his support for abortion rights that he voted no on an Illinois bill that would require a baby that "accidentally" survived an attempted abortion to be given medical treatment to survive. His campaign bristles when his opponents accuse him of supporting "infanticide" but it is clearly there to be found on what little record he has. And this from an African-American who should know the devastating affect that abortion is having to the black community.

And yet the alleged enemy of the African-American community, the infamous Ku Klux Klan can only be attributed to killing a somewhat paltry 4742 people between 1882-1968. We must also bear in mind that a large number of these killings may not have even been done by the Klan as a large number of murders are attributed to years when they were actually dormant. Nonetheless it is a number that pales against the 16 million black people that have been murdered through abortion at the current rate of 1452 a day!

I have always found it amusing that black people vote for democrats. Why? After all the Ku Klux Klan was comprised almost entirely of Democrats, or as they were fond of calling themselves, "dixiecrats." There is even still a "former" Klansman in the Senate now in West Virginia's Robert Byrd, a Democrat of course. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican as were almost all blacks at that time. It was the Democrats who fought for and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s. During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, as in the case of the previously mentioned Alabama Governor George C. Wallace, who stood in the doorway of the University Of Alabama to deny the enrollment of black students.

Yet in election after election dating back to the seventies 9 out of 10 blacks vote for the democratic candidate every time. How did this happen? Did democrats change their ways? All the evidence suggests exactly the opposite! There has been a relatively successful effort on the part of Democrats to portray the Republican party as being more hospitable to those who possess racist views, yet there exists no evidence for such accusations. In fact, the record of Republicans from Abraham Lincoln right up to the current administration of George W. Bush shows a consistent commitment to an evenhanded application of civil rights. Yet even the aforementioned Alabama Governor George Wallace managed to get himself elected to office by claiming most of the black vote in spite of his segregationist behavior. Remarkable!

The Democratic party has consistently supported policies that, though outwardly purported to be noble and charitable, have nonetheless caused great harm to the very people who enthusiastically support them. Do we remember Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs that created and expanded the welfare system? LBJ declared a war on Poverty. Yet what were the results? The 1960s War on Poverty was intended to eliminate child poverty nationwide through a variety of income transfers (some might call this "spreading the wealth") and human development programs. However, during the first three decades of the War on Poverty, there was little net decline in the child poverty rate. In 1965 the child poverty rate was 20.7 percent. Thirty years later, in 1996 the child poverty rate was only slightly lower at 19.8 percent. Yet there were "unintended" consequences. But were they "unintended?"

"... in politics nothing is accidental. If something happens, be assured it was planned this way" - Franklin D. Roosevelt,

The number of single-parent families has grown considerably since the onset of the War on Poverty. In 1960, less than 12 percent of children lived in single-parent families. By 2000, that figure had more than doubled, rising to 27.6 percent. In 1960, only 28 percent of black females ages 15 to 44 were never married and illegitimacy among blacks was 22 percent. Today, the never-married rate is 56 percent and illegitimacy stands at 70 percent!! If today's black family structure were what it was in 1960, the overall black poverty rate would be in or near single digits. However, thanks to the meddling policies of the democratic party the black family unit has been decimated. This in turn, leads many black women to turn to abortions as a solution to their dilemma. But was this an unintended consequence of a noble attempt to reduce poverty, or a planned experiment in social engineering designed to harm the black race? Remember these policies were implemented in the mid sixties when liberal and segregationist democrats controlled majorities in both houses of Congress and the White House. A situation we are about to recreate.

"Do not do unto others that which they will do to themselves." - Sidney Allen Johnson

Yea, I want credit for that proverb. Who needs a Ku Klux Klan when the African-American community is willing to sell its votes to a party that is openly supporting a campaign to destroy them? There's no need for burning crosses and lynchings. Abortion has become a Klansman's dream come true. 1452 black women every day walk into an abortion clinic and destroy their own children. As a reward for their compliance you will now have the opportunity to elect a President who has totally sold himself, and his own people, out to their own destruction. I'm sure some of you out there are saying: "hey what about all the white women having abortions?" Well, you know some white people need killin' too! And the white families that were vulnerable to the social experimentation of the welfare state are equally undesirable to the elites who conceived this scheme. Social engineering cuts a lot of different ways. But there are more white people, they will survive the attrition. Well, the right ones will anyway! Eugenics experimentation didn't end with the crushing of the Nazi regime...its alive and well today.

"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind." - United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes

On November 4th, 95% of what is expected to be a huge black turnout, will cast their votes for self destruction. For sure, the most racist of these black people have actually led themselves to believe that they are putting it to the white man. They actually believe Barack Obama is going to "spread the wealth" their way. Yet they and their messianic candidate are voting for the continuation of the genocide against the African-American community. He will fulfill the expectations of his benefactors. Sorry to shatter your illusions, but the people who vote for him are not his benefactors. That he is an African-American has proven to be a useful novelty, but his history has shown that he will do as he always has done. He will look out for his own interests. And it is in his interest to do what he is told.

Are "spread the wealth" policies and support for abortion rights an objective, or simply a means to another, more diabolical and malevolent objective? It makes no difference to me. I am voting for a man and a party that has consistently fought for life and freedom. Did the segregationist and liberal democrats of old disappear, or are we witnessing the fruition of their most ingenious crime? The Ku Klux Klan of old had some interesting costumes, and I must confess that the burning crosses are somewhat appealing in a theatrical sort of way. But it was the brilliant idea of recruiting their victims into supporting their own damnation and destruction that stands as the dixiecrats and the Ku Klux Klan's master stroke. For them, the end justified the means. Over 16 million served!

ON NOVEMBER 4th, IF YOU VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT...HE GETS IT!!

Statistics on abortion from the Guttmacher institute. Statistics on the war on poverty from the Heritage Foundation.